Skip to main content

Management Board

In countries where there is greater inclusivity in decision-making, or where there is a strong family dominance, it is possible that a
A
The 2-tier system may also operate with family dominated companies, with family members having their own top-level private Board which has controlling voting rights (and therefore where the true decision-making power rests).
To an extent, schools in the UK may be seen to have a 2-tier system, with the Head / Principal and a small number of senior teachers on a management board, with the School Governors in a more supervisory role.
Of course, schools naturally have a lot of stakeholders (parents, teachers etc.) so would seem well-suited to this structure.
2-tier board will exist. Management Board will run the day to day operations of the company, but will be monitored by a higher level Supervisory Board. In UK terms, this is similar to having the NEDs on a top board, with the Executive Directors on a separate lower Board. Advantages of 2-tier boards ● Where there is a large Board, splitting into 2 may make discussion and decision making easier.
● The existence of 2 Boards allows for more stakeholders to be involved.
● By separating NEDs from the Executive Directors, the independence of the NEDs is likely to be improved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ISA 600: Using the work of another auditor

ISA 600: Using the work of another auditor The principal auditor has responsibility for the opinion on the group financial statements. In most countries this responsibility is not diminished by reliance on the work of the other auditors of the subsidiary companies or associates. The auditors of the subsidiary companies are a source of evidence only. The principal auditor must decide how much reliance he will place on the work performed by these other auditors. In order to do this he will consider the qualifications, experience and resources of the other auditors.  Generally the principal auditor should have the right to ask the other company auditors for all reasonable information and explanations required to form the audit opinion. ISA 600 states that the other auditors should co-operate with the principal auditor.