Skip to main content

Why deal with stakeholders at all?

Why deal with stakeholders at all? As we saw earlier in the Chapter, the traditional view is that companies should be run for their owners, the shareholders, and that is all.
However, we also saw that an alternative argument is that it might be good for business ("expedient") to keep staff happy, customers and suppliers happy, the local community happy etc.
Instrumental Many believe that companies should demonstrate some CSR purely for profit reasons – that CSR looks good to the outside World and leads to higher sales.
There is no moral element to this decision – the decision is taken purely for profit.
Studies have shown that most consumers in the UK believe that companies are only fighting pollution, being nice to suppliers, and looking after employees because they think it makes them look like good companies and attract customers and profits.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ISA 600: Using the work of another auditor

ISA 600: Using the work of another auditor The principal auditor has responsibility for the opinion on the group financial statements. In most countries this responsibility is not diminished by reliance on the work of the other auditors of the subsidiary companies or associates. The auditors of the subsidiary companies are a source of evidence only. The principal auditor must decide how much reliance he will place on the work performed by these other auditors. In order to do this he will consider the qualifications, experience and resources of the other auditors.  Generally the principal auditor should have the right to ask the other company auditors for all reasonable information and explanations required to form the audit opinion. ISA 600 states that the other auditors should co-operate with the principal auditor.