Skip to main content

FAMILY DOMINATED COMPANIES

FAMILY DOMINATED COMPANIES In family companies, it is often the case that:
● family members have special voting rights
● family members have guaranteed seats on the board.
This can lead to both positive and negative governance issues.
Positive ● with the family name at stake, there is likely to be a greater feeling of "ownership" on the Board, which may reduce the risk of unethical behaviour
● to continue the family name, a longer term view of management may occur.
Negative ● a less independent board
● the board may have a dominant person / group of family members
● with board members often coming from a single family, there may be a lack of variety in ideas, and an unwillingness to change previous decisions
● family problems may become business problems
● there may be unsuitable people on the board, who were elected purely because of their membership of the family.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ISA 600: Using the work of another auditor

ISA 600: Using the work of another auditor The principal auditor has responsibility for the opinion on the group financial statements. In most countries this responsibility is not diminished by reliance on the work of the other auditors of the subsidiary companies or associates. The auditors of the subsidiary companies are a source of evidence only. The principal auditor must decide how much reliance he will place on the work performed by these other auditors. In order to do this he will consider the qualifications, experience and resources of the other auditors.  Generally the principal auditor should have the right to ask the other company auditors for all reasonable information and explanations required to form the audit opinion. ISA 600 states that the other auditors should co-operate with the principal auditor.