Skip to main content

Managing risk

Managing risk There are many techniques available to manage risk. Some look to manage overall risk, whilst others target specific risks. Avoiding risk Some risks can be totally avoided. If a business has identified that opening a subsidiary in Austria appears high risk, then not opening the subsidiary solves the problem!
However, to totally avoid a business opportunity is often a rather extreme reaction – and if no risks are taken, the chance of returns being earned is small! Reducing risk
Overall Risk Reduction Risk is the uncertainty caused by variable returns. One way to deal with uncertainty is to
By operating in many different sectors, it is likely that when one sector is performing badly, another will be doing well, leading to a diversify. smoothing of profits. Advantages of Diversification ● Smoothing of profits, making forward planning easier
● May be economies of scale between some sectors, however diverse those sectors are. Disadvantages of Diversification ● Spreading resources and knowledge too thin
● Being reasonable at many things, but not particularly good at any of them, can smooth returns, but at a relatively low average return
● Investors may question the strategy
● Harder to control the business as it grows in size
● Maybe diversification should be left to shareholders…
● Diversification works best where the business areas are
Risk Pooling negatively correlated – and this means they are usually very different sectors where the ability to get economies of scale, share knowledge etc. may be limited. In some areas of a business, risks can be reduced by centrally managing transactions and looking for possibilities to offset positions.
A centralized Treasury function can manage cash inflows and outflows throughout a business, matching cash surpluses in one sector with cash deficits in other parts
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Polly Peck, Maxwell, Barings

soft skills Polly Peck, Maxwell, Barings The 20 th century <Polly Peck, Maxwell, Barings > In 1932, two economists Bearle and Means made some observations about American companies: ● Shareholders were more likely to sell their shares than speak out if they thought directors were not running the company very well. This could result in poor quality management never losing their jobs. ● Some American companies were getting very By the 1950s, companies were growing ever larger – what we now know as " The 1970s – 1990s saw problems starting to become common. By the late 1980s, there were some famous corporate collapses – some due to poor management, but many due to fraud: large , and with so many shareholders there was a growing gap between those who owned the companies, and those who controlled them. globalization " … the existence of large multinational companies with influence around the world was well under way. Polly Peck ● Rapid growth in the 1980s took this East...
Post a Comment
Read more

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance varies around the World, largely due to different history and cultures. In the UK and US, the model is aimed primarily at the rights of shareholders. In Germany and much of continental Europe, and also in Japan, In Japan, many major company structures were traditionally based around banks. Large groups of companies from many industries would all be financed, and part-owned by a major bank, which would create a strong financial alliance. Cross-shareholdings between companies were common, and in many cases the companies in the "group" would all supply each other. In South America, Italy, Spain, and large parts of East Asia (e.g. Indonesia) the focus is more on banks play a more prominent role, often holding shares and having Board members. Such governance models tend to be more inclusive, ensuring that the rights of workers, customers and suppliers (and maybe the community) are represented at Board level. family ownership , with a large % of the bigges...
Post a Comment
Read more

AUDITING STANDARDS AND QUALITY CONTROL

soft skills Just as there are accounting standards, there are also audit standards to give auditors guidance (and in some cases rules) as to how they should perform their audit work. Many countries have their own national audit standards – e.g. In the UK, the Auditing Practices Board set them. There are also International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), which are set by the International Audit & Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), part of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). For countries without their own audit standards, the ISAs provide a set of standards that can be adopted, or altered based on national requirements. Quality control is partly achieved by having audit standards to follow ... however it is also achieved by the RSBs (e.g. ACCA) checking the audit work of their members, and handling complaints. The RSBs also have rules to ensure their members are keeping up to date with technical changes. AUDITING STANDARDS AND QUALITY CONTROL
Post a Comment
Read more